GST Rulings

GST | When should a Writ Petition be Filed before the Jurisdictional High Court?

PROVISION/S

If any person is aggrieved by any decision / order passed by an adjudicating authority, he can appeal to the Appellate Authority vide Section 107(1) of the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Act, 2017. Such decision / order may be passed under the CGST Act / SGST Act / UTGST Act (or even IGST Act by virtue of Section 20 therein).

Instead, there are many instances where the assessee approaches the jurisdictional High Court by filing a writ petition (under Article 226 of the Constitution of India).

ISSUE/S

When a statutory remedy is available under Section 107 ibid, can the assessee approach the jurisdictional High Court by means of a writ petition?

OBSERVATIONS OF THE SUPREME COURT

The Supreme Court observed[1] that mere existence of a statutory / alternate remedy would not jeopardise the maintainability of a writ petition under Article 226 ibid. A writ petition can be entertained under exceptional circumstances like:

  • Breach of fundamental rights;
  • Violation of principles of natural justice;
  • Excess of jurisdiction; and
  • Challenge to the vires of the statute or delegated legislation.

In the instant case, a notice was served by the Department for the alleged non-compliance. Consequently, there was no violation of principles of natural justice. Similarly, no other exceptions stated supra could be established.

[1] Civil Appeal No. 5121 of 2021 dated September 03, 2021

COMMENTS / ANALYSIS

Aggrieved parties should note that a writ petition should be filed under Article 226 ibid only if the existence of any of the aforesaid circumstances can be established before the Hon’ble High Court.

Srinivasan V, Advocate

Recent Posts

60 days time limit to pass GST refund order is mandatory: Calcutta HC

Decision / Observations [Order of the Hon'ble High Court of Calcutta, dated 30.07.2025, in M.A.T.…

3 months ago

CA certificate for receipt of net forex acceptable in lieu of FIRCs: Gujarat HC

Facts The Petitioner, engaged in export of services, had claimed refund of unutilized GST Input…

3 months ago

Why right to cross-examination is not unfettered: Delhi HC

[Order of the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi, dated 09.04.2025, in W.P. (C) No. 4576…

6 months ago

EWB detention proceedings conclude on penalty payment, no need to issue order: Orissa HC

Orissa HC judgment dt. 18.02.2025 in W.P.(C) No. 3055 of 2025 Goods were detained &…

8 months ago

Refund limitation for GST wrongly paid

GST was paid but later clarified as not payable by a beneficial circular. In Messrs…

8 months ago

GST | Should 3 months be construed as 90 days for limitation?

Order of the Andhra Pradesh High Court [dated 05.02.2025, in Cotton Corporation of India vs.…

8 months ago