GST Rulings

GSTR-1 manual rectification permitted beyond limitation: Cal. HC

Order of the High Court of Calcutta

[dated 17.09.2024, in Nivriya India (P.) Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner of State Tax, from WPA 14380 of 2024]

While filling GSTR-1, the petitioner had inadvertently marked certain supplies as "without payment of IGST" instead of "with payment of IGST". However, Form GSTR-3B was filed correctly, viz., with payment of IGST. Accordingly, refund was rejected.

It was held that the petitioner is permitted to file a manual application for rectification of Form GSTR-1 since the time limit to rectify the said form online has passed. This is based on the premise that the petitioner should not be prejudiced from availing the benefit which it is otherwise legitimately entitled to.

Comments

The order speaks about filing of Form RFD-01 by the petitioner and partial rejection thereof on the aforesaid grounds. It not clear how and why the petitioner filed Form RFD-01 for refund of taxes paid on exports. However, the underlying principle (that assessee should not be prejudiced from availing benefit which it is otherwise legitimately entitled) is worth noting and may be used in similar inadvertent situations.

Srinivasan V, Advocate

Share
Published by
Srinivasan V, Advocate
Tags: Form GSTR-1Rectification of GST Returns
1 year ago

Recent Posts

Opportunity to prove bona fides must be given to recipient before ITC denial on account of supplier’s fault: Gauhati HC

Issue The Petitioner had questioned the validity of Section 16(2)(aa) of the CGST Act, 2017.…

4 days ago

Fee collected by universities not subject to GST: Karnataka HC

Decision / Observations [Order of the Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka, dated 24.11.2025, in WP.…

4 days ago

60 days time limit to pass GST refund order is mandatory: Calcutta HC

Decision / Observations [Order of the Hon'ble High Court of Calcutta, dated 30.07.2025, in M.A.T.…

5 months ago

CA certificate for receipt of net forex acceptable in lieu of FIRCs: Gujarat HC

Facts The Petitioner, engaged in export of services, had claimed refund of unutilized GST Input…

6 months ago

Why right to cross-examination is not unfettered: Delhi HC

[Order of the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi, dated 09.04.2025, in W.P. (C) No. 4576…

8 months ago

EWB detention proceedings conclude on penalty payment, no need to issue order: Orissa HC

Orissa HC judgment dt. 18.02.2025 in W.P.(C) No. 3055 of 2025 Goods were detained &…

10 months ago