GST Rulings

Fee collected by universities not subject to GST: Karnataka HC

Decision / Observations

[Order of the Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka, dated 24.11.2025, in WP. no. 100780 OF 2024 (T-Res)]

Following the decision dated 22.04.2025 of the Coordinate Bench in WP. no. 4254/2024(T-Res), wherein it was held that:

i) Activities of universities are not commercial in nature and cannot be termed as 'supply' in the course or furtherance of business;

ii) Income derived from students and colleges and other income incidental to the main functions of the University cannot be brought to tax under GST;

iii) As they perform public functions and are entrusted with a statutory duty in public interest, it cannot be said that the statutory functions carried out for a fee would constitute "consideration" under the GST legislations;

iv) Activities carried out by the universities are under the respective statutory provisions, which are in the nature of statutory/regulatory functions and the same cannot be termed as commercial in nature. Since the activities not being commercial or business in nature and the fee so charged not qualifying as consideration, the charging provisions under the GST law would not get attracted to the activities of the University;

v) If GST levy is fastened on the Universities, they would necessarily pass on the same to the colleges (being an indirect tax), and in turn colleges will pass on the same to the students. Therefore, the very object of exemption will stand defeated;

vi) The impugned Circulars dated 17.06.2021 and 11.10.2024  are contrary to the legal provisions and the express wordings of the exemption notification; and

vii) Affiliation fees, PG registration fees, admissions fees, convocation fees and other sums collected by the petitioners-Universities from the College/students would not be exigible/amenable to payment of GST;

the Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka quashed the impugned orders passed against the petitioner.

Srinivasan V, Advocate

Recent Posts

Opportunity to prove bona fides must be given to recipient before ITC denial on account of supplier’s fault: Gauhati HC

Issue The Petitioner had questioned the validity of Section 16(2)(aa) of the CGST Act, 2017.…

4 days ago

60 days time limit to pass GST refund order is mandatory: Calcutta HC

Decision / Observations [Order of the Hon'ble High Court of Calcutta, dated 30.07.2025, in M.A.T.…

5 months ago

CA certificate for receipt of net forex acceptable in lieu of FIRCs: Gujarat HC

Facts The Petitioner, engaged in export of services, had claimed refund of unutilized GST Input…

6 months ago

Why right to cross-examination is not unfettered: Delhi HC

[Order of the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi, dated 09.04.2025, in W.P. (C) No. 4576…

8 months ago

EWB detention proceedings conclude on penalty payment, no need to issue order: Orissa HC

Orissa HC judgment dt. 18.02.2025 in W.P.(C) No. 3055 of 2025 Goods were detained &…

10 months ago

Refund limitation for GST wrongly paid

GST was paid but later clarified as not payable by a beneficial circular. In Messrs…

10 months ago