GST Rulings

Can penalty alone be challenged when GST demand is accepted?

Order of the High Court of Madras

[dated 12.08.2024, in Aatral Associates v. State Tax Officer, from W.P. no. 21544 of 2024]

Demand was confirmed against the petitioner for both tax and penalty. Petitioner accepted and paid the tax portion. However, he filed an appeal against the penalty. Appellate authority rejected the appeal, citing that penalty alone cannot be challenged when tax demand was accepted.

The Hon'ble Court held the order of the appellate authority, rejecting the appeal, as not proper.

Comments

Whether the impugned order was passed under section 73 or section 74 of the CGST Act is not evident from the order of the Hon'ble Court. However, whether penalty alone can be challenged is lingering in the minds of several taxpayers, particularly in the context of waiver of interest and penalty under section 128A ibid, which is expected to be brought into force shortly. The said order of the Hon'ble High Court of Madras appears to give a pointer on this issue.

Srinivasan V, Advocate

Recent Posts

P&H HC issues detailed guidelines on ITC denial for supplier’s non-payment

Background According to Section 16(2)(c) of the CGST Act, if tax charged in respect of…

3 weeks ago

Can consequential refund, arising from OIA, be rejected by OIO?

Background Order-in-Original (OIO, which partly rejected refund) was set aside by Order-in-Appeal (OIA). Fresh refund…

1 month ago

Inviolable principles governing Section 74 proceedings

"But for the audit undertaken by the Department, the suppression of facts would have gone…

1 month ago

Non-response to SCN & DRC01A construed as suppression: Madras HC

Background Intimation in DRC-01A and Show Cause Notice (SCN) were issued. The Petitioner failed to…

3 months ago

HC quashes GST notice & order for non-quantification of interest in notice

Issue The show cause notice issued to the Petitioner did not quantify the proposed demand…

6 months ago

Is limitation period of 2 years applicable to duplicate payments under GST law?

Issue The petitioner in the citation referred first infra, by mistake, made a duplicate payment…

7 months ago