GST Rulings

Can cross-examination be refused for ITC denial on purchases from cancelled dealers?

Brief facts

An order was passed, confirming demand in respect of denial of ITC to the petitioner on procurement from suppliers whose GST registrations were cancelled retrospectively.

The petitioner requested for a right to cross-examine the witnesses, whose statements were relied upon, as also the authors of documents which was sought to be relied upon by the proper officer during adjudication. However, such request was denied on account of paucity of time. Yet, the impugned order was passed.

Judgment of the High Court of Delhi

[dated April 16, 2024 from WP(C) No. 5342 of 2024 in Akshit Petrochem Private Limited v. Government of NCT of Delhi]

Denial of the right to cross-examine can cause grave and serious prejudice. This view was also upheld in the judgment of the Co-ordinate Bench of the High Court of Delhi dated 30.01.2024 in WP (C) 15808/2022. Such a right cannot be declined due to paucity of time.

Consequently, denial of ITC, in respect of purchases from cancelled dealers, cannot be sustained and the impugned order was set aside to that extent. The Show Cause Notice was remitted for re-adjudication on the said aspect after summoning the said dealers/suppliers for the purpose of cross-examination and giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.

Analysis / Comments

In similar instances where ITC is denied on purchases from cancelled dealers, the taxable person should seek cross-examination of witnesses or authors of relied upon documents as a matter of right and use such opportunity judiciously.

Srinivasan V, Advocate

Recent Posts

P&H HC issues detailed guidelines on ITC denial for supplier’s non-payment

Background According to Section 16(2)(c) of the CGST Act, if tax charged in respect of…

3 weeks ago

Can consequential refund, arising from OIA, be rejected by OIO?

Background Order-in-Original (OIO, which partly rejected refund) was set aside by Order-in-Appeal (OIA). Fresh refund…

1 month ago

Inviolable principles governing Section 74 proceedings

"But for the audit undertaken by the Department, the suppression of facts would have gone…

1 month ago

Non-response to SCN & DRC01A construed as suppression: Madras HC

Background Intimation in DRC-01A and Show Cause Notice (SCN) were issued. The Petitioner failed to…

3 months ago

HC quashes GST notice & order for non-quantification of interest in notice

Issue The show cause notice issued to the Petitioner did not quantify the proposed demand…

6 months ago

Is limitation period of 2 years applicable to duplicate payments under GST law?

Issue The petitioner in the citation referred first infra, by mistake, made a duplicate payment…

7 months ago