GST Rulings

Are Variable Payments to Whole Time Directors Liable to GST?

Background

Whole-time directors were paid remuneration in the form of commission (based on percentage of profits). The Revenue demanded service tax on such variable pay.

Decision

A whole-time director is one who is in full-time employment of the company, for which he is entitled to receive remuneration. Hence, it was held[1] by the Hon’ble CESTAT (Kolkata) that such remuneration paid in conformity with the Companies Act is pursuant to employer-employee relationship. Merely since the remuneration is in the form of variable pay would not dilute or alter the employer-employee relationship.

Payments made to whole-time directors are in the nature of salary. Such factual position cannot be faulted in the absence of evidence to the contrary. When the learned adjudicating authority has allowed part of the demand (viz., the fixed pay) on the grounds of employer-employee relationship, it is infructuous to confirm the balance demand (viz., the variable pay) on the premise that directors have provided services to the company. Hence, there is no service tax liability on such payments.

[1] Excise Appeal No. 77570 of 2018; Final Order No.75561/2020 dated October 09, 2020

Comments

The aforesaid ruling (in the context of service tax) would apply in the GST regime too. However, many taxpayers fail to maintain proper documents as required under the Income-tax Act and the Companies Act, which weakens their stand.

Readers should distinguish the differential tax treatment for non-whole-time directors. For a detailed study, readers may refer the following article: http://vsrca.in/service-tax/director-remuneration/

Srinivasan V, Advocate

Recent Posts

P&H HC issues detailed guidelines on ITC denial for supplier’s non-payment

Background According to Section 16(2)(c) of the CGST Act, if tax charged in respect of…

3 weeks ago

Can consequential refund, arising from OIA, be rejected by OIO?

Background Order-in-Original (OIO, which partly rejected refund) was set aside by Order-in-Appeal (OIA). Fresh refund…

1 month ago

Inviolable principles governing Section 74 proceedings

"But for the audit undertaken by the Department, the suppression of facts would have gone…

1 month ago

Non-response to SCN & DRC01A construed as suppression: Madras HC

Background Intimation in DRC-01A and Show Cause Notice (SCN) were issued. The Petitioner failed to…

3 months ago

HC quashes GST notice & order for non-quantification of interest in notice

Issue The show cause notice issued to the Petitioner did not quantify the proposed demand…

6 months ago

Is limitation period of 2 years applicable to duplicate payments under GST law?

Issue The petitioner in the citation referred first infra, by mistake, made a duplicate payment…

7 months ago