GST Rulings

Writ petition dismissed owing to alternate remedy when vires of GST law challenged: Guj HC DB

Order of the High Court of Gujarat

[dated 02.08.2024, in Shree Balaji Engineering Services v. Union of India, from R/Special civil application no. 11281 of 2024]

Inter alia, the petitioner had challenged the vires of section 16(2)(c) of the CGST Act. Citing the decision of the Hon'ble Apex Court in Assistant Commissioner of State Tax v. M/s. Commercial Steel Ltd. in Civil Appeal No.5121 of 2021 rendered on 03.09.2021, it was opined that alterative efficacious remedy of appeal is available to the petitioner under section 107 ibid. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed.

Comments

At the outset, the Hon'ble Apex Court in Assistant Commissioner of State Tax v. M/s. Commercial Steel Ltd. (referred supra) had stated that a writ petition can be entertained under exceptional circumstances like:

  • Breach of fundamental rights;
  • Violation of principles of natural justice;
  • Excess of jurisdiction; and
  • Challenge to the vires of the statute or delegated legislation.

In the current instance, the petitioner had challenged the vires of the statute. It is impossible for an appellate authority (who is a creature of the statute) to declare a provision in the same statute as ultra vires. Given this,  it is not clear how the alternate remedy of appeal can be efficacious.

Srinivasan V, Advocate

Recent Posts

60 days time limit to pass GST refund order is mandatory: Calcutta HC

Decision / Observations [Order of the Hon'ble High Court of Calcutta, dated 30.07.2025, in M.A.T.…

3 weeks ago

CA certificate for receipt of net forex acceptable in lieu of FIRCs: Gujarat HC

Facts The Petitioner, engaged in export of services, had claimed refund of unutilized GST Input…

1 month ago

Why right to cross-examination is not unfettered: Delhi HC

[Order of the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi, dated 09.04.2025, in W.P. (C) No. 4576…

4 months ago

EWB detention proceedings conclude on penalty payment, no need to issue order: Orissa HC

Orissa HC judgment dt. 18.02.2025 in W.P.(C) No. 3055 of 2025 Goods were detained &…

5 months ago

Refund limitation for GST wrongly paid

GST was paid but later clarified as not payable by a beneficial circular. In Messrs…

6 months ago

GST | Should 3 months be construed as 90 days for limitation?

Order of the Andhra Pradesh High Court [dated 05.02.2025, in Cotton Corporation of India vs.…

6 months ago