GST Rulings

GST | When should a Writ Petition be Filed before the Jurisdictional High Court?

PROVISION/S

If any person is aggrieved by any decision / order passed by an adjudicating authority, he can appeal to the Appellate Authority vide Section 107(1) of the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Act, 2017. Such decision / order may be passed under the CGST Act / SGST Act / UTGST Act (or even IGST Act by virtue of Section 20 therein).

Instead, there are many instances where the assessee approaches the jurisdictional High Court by filing a writ petition (under Article 226 of the Constitution of India).

ISSUE/S

When a statutory remedy is available under Section 107 ibid, can the assessee approach the jurisdictional High Court by means of a writ petition?

OBSERVATIONS OF THE SUPREME COURT

The Supreme Court observed[1] that mere existence of a statutory / alternate remedy would not jeopardise the maintainability of a writ petition under Article 226 ibid. A writ petition can be entertained under exceptional circumstances like:

  • Breach of fundamental rights;
  • Violation of principles of natural justice;
  • Excess of jurisdiction; and
  • Challenge to the vires of the statute or delegated legislation.

In the instant case, a notice was served by the Department for the alleged non-compliance. Consequently, there was no violation of principles of natural justice. Similarly, no other exceptions stated supra could be established.

[1] Civil Appeal No. 5121 of 2021 dated September 03, 2021

COMMENTS / ANALYSIS

Aggrieved parties should note that a writ petition should be filed under Article 226 ibid only if the existence of any of the aforesaid circumstances can be established before the Hon’ble High Court.

Srinivasan V, Advocate

Recent Posts

EWB detention proceedings conclude on penalty payment, no need to issue order: Orissa HC

Orissa HC judgment dt. 18.02.2025 in W.P.(C) No. 3055 of 2025 Goods were detained &…

1 month ago

Refund limitation for GST wrongly paid

GST was paid but later clarified as not payable by a beneficial circular. In Messrs…

2 months ago

GST | Should 3 months be construed as 90 days for limitation?

Order of the Andhra Pradesh High Court [dated 05.02.2025, in Cotton Corporation of India vs.…

2 months ago

GST | Should the date of issue of notice/order be included to calculate limitation?

Order of the Patna High Court [dated 04.02.2025, in Brand Protection Services (P.) Ltd. vs.…

2 months ago

Notice/order can be served on the portal only if it cannot be served in person / by post / email: Madras HC

Order of the High Court of Madras [dated 06.01.2025, in Udumalpet Sarvodaya Sangham vs. Authority,…

2 months ago

Goods intercepted due to absence of e-invoice; proceedings to lie u/s.122 not s.129 CGST Act: HC

Order of the High Court of Kerala [dated 07.11.2024, in OSEL Devices Ltd. vs. Assistant…

4 months ago