GST Rulings

Is late fee leviable on GSTR-9C?

Order of the High Court of Kerala

[dated 01.07.2024, in Raju Sreedharan v. Superintendent, Central Tax & Central Excise, from W.P. (C) No. 9681 of 2024]

In Anishia Chandrakanth v. Superintendent, Central Tax & Central Excise [W.P.(C) No.30644 of 2023], the Hon'ble High Court of Kerala (vide order dated dated 09.04.2024) observed as follows:

  • It is not in dispute that the GST portal does not support payment of late fee for late filing GSTR-9C.  Rather, the portal enables charging late fee for GSTR-9 only.
  • Annual return in GSTR-9 filed without GSTR-9C may be deficient, attracting general penalty. However, late fee cannot be made applicable for regularising GSTR-9 by filing GSTR-9C.
  • When the Government itself has waived late fee for non-filers of GSTR-9, there appears to be no justification in continuing with the notices for non-payment of late fee for belated filing of GSTR-9C, that too filed by the taxpayers before the date of commencement of the amnesty scheme.

Following the above decision, it was held that order demanding late fee on belated filing of GSTR-9C is set aside. However, the petitioner will not be entitled to refund of late fee already paid by him on belated filing of GSTR-9 (in excess of that stipulated under the waiver).

Comments

In paragraph 25 of the aforesaid order dated 09.04.2024, the differentiation between belated filing of GSTR-9 and GSTR-9C appears blurred.

Nevertheless, a registered person is liable to pay late fee under Section 47(2) of the CGST Act, 2017 only when he fails to furnish the "return" in FORM GSTR-9 under Section 44 ibid. It is important to note that: (i) GSTR-9C is only a "reconciliation statement" to be filed along with the annual return; and (ii) GSTR-9C is not a "return" as contemplated under Section 44 ibid.

Thus, in the absence of a legislative backing, it is apparent that late fee cannot be demanded for belated filing of Form GSTR-9C.

Srinivasan V, Advocate

Recent Posts

P&H HC issues detailed guidelines on ITC denial for supplier’s non-payment

Background According to Section 16(2)(c) of the CGST Act, if tax charged in respect of…

3 weeks ago

Can consequential refund, arising from OIA, be rejected by OIO?

Background Order-in-Original (OIO, which partly rejected refund) was set aside by Order-in-Appeal (OIA). Fresh refund…

1 month ago

Inviolable principles governing Section 74 proceedings

"But for the audit undertaken by the Department, the suppression of facts would have gone…

1 month ago

Non-response to SCN & DRC01A construed as suppression: Madras HC

Background Intimation in DRC-01A and Show Cause Notice (SCN) were issued. The Petitioner failed to…

3 months ago

HC quashes GST notice & order for non-quantification of interest in notice

Issue The show cause notice issued to the Petitioner did not quantify the proposed demand…

6 months ago

Is limitation period of 2 years applicable to duplicate payments under GST law?

Issue The petitioner in the citation referred first infra, by mistake, made a duplicate payment…

7 months ago