GST Rulings

Inverted Rate GST ITC Refund Allowed on Traded Goods

GST rate on inputs could be different from that of output, even in the case of traded goods. This may be on account of:

  • Reduction in GST rate between the time of purchase and that of sale;
  • Supply of traded products, with partial exemption (e.g., supply of certain scientific instruments, etc. to notified institutions vide Notification No.45/2017-Central Tax (Rate)).

CONFLICT BETWEEN STATUTE AND CIRCULAR

Paragraph 3 of Circular No.135/05/2020-GST dated March 31, 2020 issued by the Central Board of Indirect Tax and Customs (CBIC) specifically denies refund of accumulated Input Tax Credit (ITC) in situations where the tax rate is reduced on traded products.

On the other hand, clause (ii) of the first proviso to Section 54(3) of Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Act, 2017 allows refund of un-utilised ITC where such ITC is accumulated on account of tax rate on inputs being higher than the tax rate on output supplies.

JUDGMENT / ORDER OF THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

The Gauhati High Court observed[1] that there is a conflict between the statute and circular, as detailed above. If there is any conflict between the provisions of an enactment and that of a notification / circular thereunder, the former would prevail. Consequently, it held that the portion of the circular (detailed above) should be ignored.

[1] WP(C)/3878/2021 dated September 02, 2021

COMMENTS / ANALYSIS

Vide our post dated April 12, 2020 (http://vsrca.in/gst/refund-circular-135-issues/), we had explicitly mentioned that: “… The said clause nowhere restricts refund if the input and output are the same product. … While the Government can issue Circulars for easing the restrictions in law or for administrative convenience, it should desist from interpreting the law through Circulars. It is highly plausible that a smart assessee would knock the doors of the judiciary for justice on this count.”

In the instant case, the Gauhati High Court dealt with a situation where the tax rate on certain partly exempt output supplies were lower than the tax rate on inputs. This judgment would hold good even for taxpayers who faced significant changes in tax rates during the first two years under the GST regime.

Srinivasan V, Advocate

Share
Published by
Srinivasan V, Advocate
Tags: GST | Unutilised ITCGST Inverted Rate RefundGST Refund
4 years ago

Recent Posts

EWB detention proceedings conclude on penalty payment, no need to issue order: Orissa HC

Orissa HC judgment dt. 18.02.2025 in W.P.(C) No. 3055 of 2025 Goods were detained &…

1 month ago

Refund limitation for GST wrongly paid

GST was paid but later clarified as not payable by a beneficial circular. In Messrs…

2 months ago

GST | Should 3 months be construed as 90 days for limitation?

Order of the Andhra Pradesh High Court [dated 05.02.2025, in Cotton Corporation of India vs.…

2 months ago

GST | Should the date of issue of notice/order be included to calculate limitation?

Order of the Patna High Court [dated 04.02.2025, in Brand Protection Services (P.) Ltd. vs.…

2 months ago

Notice/order can be served on the portal only if it cannot be served in person / by post / email: Madras HC

Order of the High Court of Madras [dated 06.01.2025, in Udumalpet Sarvodaya Sangham vs. Authority,…

2 months ago

Goods intercepted due to absence of e-invoice; proceedings to lie u/s.122 not s.129 CGST Act: HC

Order of the High Court of Kerala [dated 07.11.2024, in OSEL Devices Ltd. vs. Assistant…

4 months ago