GST Posts

GST Input Tax Credit on ‘Buy One, Get One Free’ Offer

Usually, business entities in the Fast-Moving Consumer Goods (FMCG) sector announce ‘buy one, get one free’ offers / schemes. These are directed towards better sales traction.

CBIC CIRCULAR

Barring activities or transactions specified in Schedule I of the CGST Act, goods or services supplied free of cost (that is, without consideration) are not treated as ‘supply’ under Section 7 ibid. It would appear one item is supplied free of cost in such offers. However, it is not an individual supply of free goods. Rather, these are two or more individual supplies wherein a single price is charged for the entire supply.

Undoubtedly, the tax rate on such supply is dependent on whether it is a composite or mixed supply as per Section 8 ibid. Nevertheless, Input Tax Credit (ITC) is available to the supplier for the inputs, input services and capital goods used for effecting such supply. This was unambiguously clarified by the CBIC vide Circular No. 92/11/2019-GST dated March 07, 2019.

CONTRARY ADVANCE RULING

A taxpayer offered one unit of dhoop with a pack of agarbatti (comprising 10 pieces of agarbatti). The Authority for Advance Ruling ruled[1] that ITC is not eligible on inputs used for manufacture of dhoop (or) on purchase of dhoop from third party vendor(s).

Similarly, the taxpayer offered one unit of agarbatti free on purchase of one carton box of agarbatti. Here too, it was ruled that ITC is not eligible on the agarbatti given free of cost.

[1] Ruling Order No. GUJ/GAAR/R/14/2019

AUTHOR’S COMMENTS

From the Order, it appears the GST Department provided its comments vide letter dated April 20, 2018. The Order of the Authority is dated August 23, 2019, post the issue of the aforesaid Circular. Yet, there is no reference to the said Circular in the Order.

Further, according to Section 98(6) ibid, the Authority should pronounce its ruling within 90 days from the date of receipt of application for advance ruling.

Srinivasan V, Advocate

Recent Posts

EWB detention proceedings conclude on penalty payment, no need to issue order: Orissa HC

Orissa HC judgment dt. 18.02.2025 in W.P.(C) No. 3055 of 2025 Goods were detained &…

3 weeks ago

Refund limitation for GST wrongly paid

GST was paid but later clarified as not payable by a beneficial circular. In Messrs…

1 month ago

GST | Should 3 months be construed as 90 days for limitation?

Order of the Andhra Pradesh High Court [dated 05.02.2025, in Cotton Corporation of India vs.…

1 month ago

GST | Should the date of issue of notice/order be included to calculate limitation?

Order of the Patna High Court [dated 04.02.2025, in Brand Protection Services (P.) Ltd. vs.…

1 month ago

Notice/order can be served on the portal only if it cannot be served in person / by post / email: Madras HC

Order of the High Court of Madras [dated 06.01.2025, in Udumalpet Sarvodaya Sangham vs. Authority,…

2 months ago

Goods intercepted due to absence of e-invoice; proceedings to lie u/s.122 not s.129 CGST Act: HC

Order of the High Court of Kerala [dated 07.11.2024, in OSEL Devices Ltd. vs. Assistant…

4 months ago