GST Rulings

GST Provisional Attachment: Can Entire GST Demand be Recovered During Limitation Period of Appeal?

Brief Facts

The Revenue authorities instituted recovery proceedings and recovered the entire amount of demand within three months from the date of order of the first appellate authority (which had ruled in favour of the Revenue). It appears such recovery was on the strength of a subsisting provisional attachment.

However, the assessee had the right to appeal before the Appellate Tribunal within the limitation period of three months, upon payment of 20% of disputed tax liability. [ref: Section 112(8) of the CGST Act]

Order

[By the Hon’ble High Court of Calcutta][1] When provisions related to appeal are available in the statute, the GST authorities can recover only 20% of the disputed tax.

[1] W.P. No. 22281 (W) of 2019 and C.A.N. No. 11697 of 2019; Order dated January 22, 2020

Author's Comments

Section 83 ibid permits provisional attachment only during pendency of any proceedings under Sections 62, 63, 64, 67, 73 or 74 ibid. However, in the instant case, Order-in-Appeal has been passed.

When the pre-deposit is paid, recovery proceeding for the balance amount is deemed to be stayed till the disposal of appeal [ref: Section 112(9) ibid]. Although the Tribunal is yet to be constituted under the GST law, assessee proceeding on appeal should make use of this safeguard to avoid recovery proceeding from revenue authorities.

Srinivasan V, Advocate

Recent Posts

EWB detention proceedings conclude on penalty payment, no need to issue order: Orissa HC

Orissa HC judgment dt. 18.02.2025 in W.P.(C) No. 3055 of 2025 Goods were detained &…

1 month ago

Refund limitation for GST wrongly paid

GST was paid but later clarified as not payable by a beneficial circular. In Messrs…

2 months ago

GST | Should 3 months be construed as 90 days for limitation?

Order of the Andhra Pradesh High Court [dated 05.02.2025, in Cotton Corporation of India vs.…

2 months ago

GST | Should the date of issue of notice/order be included to calculate limitation?

Order of the Patna High Court [dated 04.02.2025, in Brand Protection Services (P.) Ltd. vs.…

2 months ago

Notice/order can be served on the portal only if it cannot be served in person / by post / email: Madras HC

Order of the High Court of Madras [dated 06.01.2025, in Udumalpet Sarvodaya Sangham vs. Authority,…

2 months ago

Goods intercepted due to absence of e-invoice; proceedings to lie u/s.122 not s.129 CGST Act: HC

Order of the High Court of Kerala [dated 07.11.2024, in OSEL Devices Ltd. vs. Assistant…

4 months ago