GST Rulings

CA certificate for receipt of net forex acceptable in lieu of FIRCs: Gujarat HC

Facts

The Petitioner, engaged in export of services, had claimed refund of unutilized GST Input Tax Credit (ITC) by providing a Chartered Accountant's (CA) certificate - instead of Foreign Inward Remittance Certificates (FIRCs) - for receipt of net foreign exchange. However, the refund was rejected on the ground of non-submission of FIRCs.

Notably, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) had accorded approval to the Petitioner, to operate a pan‑India clearing mechanism for receiving foreign currency on exports after netting off any payments in foreign currency to the overseas group entities.

Issues

Whether the net foreign exchange received by the Petitioner, under the RBI’s approval for netting off, qualifies as “convertible foreign exchange” for export services?

Whether a CA's certificate, verifying net foreign exchange receipts, can be accepted as sufficient documentary proof in lieu of FIRCs?

Decision

[Judgment of the Hon'ble High Court of Gujarat, dated 26.03.2025, in R/Special Civil Application no. 13427 of 2024]

Refund is admissible even in case of receipt of net foreign exchange, since the mechanism of set off is approved by the RBI.

Further, CA's certificate, for the receipt of convertible foreign exchange for the export of the services, is sufficient in lieu of FIRCs. This was based on the Hon'ble Supreme Court's decision in Union of India v. Mangal Textile Mills (P.) Ltd. 2011 (269) E.L.T. 3 (S.C.), wherein the certificate issued by the CA is required to be considered by the authority as an authentic document and is bound to consider the same.

Comments

Apart from emphasizing the importance of substance over form, the aforesaid judgment highlights the evidentiary value of a CA certificate.

[Prepared with inputs from Adv. S Abirami & S Srimathi]

Srinivasan V, Advocate

Recent Posts

Why right to cross-examination is not unfettered: Delhi HC

[Order of the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi, dated 09.04.2025, in W.P. (C) No. 4576…

3 months ago

EWB detention proceedings conclude on penalty payment, no need to issue order: Orissa HC

Orissa HC judgment dt. 18.02.2025 in W.P.(C) No. 3055 of 2025 Goods were detained &…

5 months ago

Refund limitation for GST wrongly paid

GST was paid but later clarified as not payable by a beneficial circular. In Messrs…

5 months ago

GST | Should 3 months be construed as 90 days for limitation?

Order of the Andhra Pradesh High Court [dated 05.02.2025, in Cotton Corporation of India vs.…

6 months ago

GST | Should the date of issue of notice/order be included to calculate limitation?

Order of the Patna High Court [dated 04.02.2025, in Brand Protection Services (P.) Ltd. vs.…

6 months ago

Notice/order can be served on the portal only if it cannot be served in person / by post / email: Madras HC

Order of the High Court of Madras [dated 06.01.2025, in Udumalpet Sarvodaya Sangham vs. Authority,…

6 months ago