GST Rulings

60 days time limit to pass GST refund order is mandatory: Calcutta HC

Decision / Observations

[Order of the Hon'ble High Court of Calcutta, dated 30.07.2025, in M.A.T. no. 104 of 2024]

The statutory time limit of 60 days as stipulated in Section 54(7) of the CGST Act is mandatory. Non-compliance with such time limit vitiates the refund rejection order. Therefore, the Department was directed to refund the entire claim with interest. With this, the earlier decision of the single member bench in the same case (that the time limit under Section 54(7) ibid was only directory in nature) stands reversed.

Similarly, the issuance of acknowledgement for the refund application - two days beyond the time limit prescribed under Rule 90(2) of the CGST Rules - shows that there could not be any allegation of the application being incomplete in any respect. That is, the proper officer loses his right to point out any deficiencies in the refund claim. Accordingly, in such cases, the refund application is assumed to be complete in all respects. This position was held by the Hon'ble Delhi High Court vide judgment dated 22.07.2020 in W.P. (C) no. 4205 of 2020.

Comments

The aforesaid decision(s) reinforce that authorities should strictly adhere to the time limits prescribed for the respective proceedings under the statute. Failure to adhere may result in the proper officer losing the right to sustain proceedings against the taxable person.

Srinivasan V, Advocate

Recent Posts

CA certificate for receipt of net forex acceptable in lieu of FIRCs: Gujarat HC

Facts The Petitioner, engaged in export of services, had claimed refund of unutilized GST Input…

1 month ago

Why right to cross-examination is not unfettered: Delhi HC

[Order of the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi, dated 09.04.2025, in W.P. (C) No. 4576…

3 months ago

EWB detention proceedings conclude on penalty payment, no need to issue order: Orissa HC

Orissa HC judgment dt. 18.02.2025 in W.P.(C) No. 3055 of 2025 Goods were detained &…

5 months ago

Refund limitation for GST wrongly paid

GST was paid but later clarified as not payable by a beneficial circular. In Messrs…

6 months ago

GST | Should 3 months be construed as 90 days for limitation?

Order of the Andhra Pradesh High Court [dated 05.02.2025, in Cotton Corporation of India vs.…

6 months ago

GST | Should the date of issue of notice/order be included to calculate limitation?

Order of the Patna High Court [dated 04.02.2025, in Brand Protection Services (P.) Ltd. vs.…

6 months ago