GST Posts

GST Reverse Charge on Renting of Motor Vehicle – Amendment Clarificatory or Expansive!

[Reading this article in landscape mode (on mobile phone) is recommended for better experience]

Reverse charge mechanism on ‘renting of motor vehicle’ service was introduced from October 01, 2019. Since the complex language used in the notification(s) confused many, the Government substituted the reverse charge entry effective December 31, 2019.

To understand the position in law from October 01, 2019 till December 30, 2019, readers may refer the following link: http://vsrca.in/gst/reverse-charge-renting-motor-vehicle/. The current post intends to elucidate the amended entry and assess if it is merely clarificatory in nature (as claimed by the Government) or if the scope is enlarged.

Amended Reverse Charge Entry

For the sake of clarity, the amended reverse charge entry under Notification No.10/2017-Integrated Tax (Rate) is reproduced herein below:

Sl. No.Category of supply of serviceSupplier of serviceRecipient of service
17Services provided by way of renting of any motor vehicle designed to carry passengers where the cost of fuel is included in the consideration charged from the service recipient, provided to a body corporate.Any person, other than a body corporate who supplies the service to a body corporate and does not issue an invoice charging integrated tax at the rate of 12 per cent. to the service recipientAny body corporate located in the taxable territory

Relevant Tariff Entry

‘Renting of motor vehicle’ service is covered under two categories: (i) HSN 9966 (Rental services of transport vehicles with operators); and (ii) HSN 9973 (Leasing or rental services without operator). Perusal of Notification No.8/2017-Integrated Tax (Rate) indicates that 12% rate is directly prescribed under HSN 9973 only for transfer or permitting the use or enjoyment of certain intellectual property rights (which is unrelated to the subject matter under discussion). However, GST @ 12% is prescribed under HSN 9966 for the following service:

Sl.No.Chapter, Section or HeadingDescription of serviceRate (per cent)Condition
10Heading 9966
(Rental services of transport vehicles with operators)
(i) Renting of any motor vehicle designed to carry passengers where the cost of fuel is included in the consideration charged from the service recipient.5Provided that credit of input tax charged on goods and services used in supplying the service, other than the input tax credit of input service in the same line of business (i.e. service procured from another service provider of transporting passengers in a motor vehicle or renting of a motor vehicle) has not been taken. …
or
12-

“Renting of motor vehicle” service vs. “Passenger transport” service

Renting of motor vehicle, designed to carry passengers, with operator (HSN 9966) is often confused with passenger transport service (HSN 9964). Hence, before proceeding, it is vital to understand the difference laid herein below.

HSN 9966 (Renting of Motor Vehicle with operator)HSN 9964 (Passenger Transport Service)
Control over the vehicleThe recipient defines how and when the vehicle will be operated, determining schedules, routes and other operational considerations – thus, supplier has little controlGenerally undertaken over pre-determined routes on a pre-determined schedule – hence, supplier has more control
Billing basisOn time; not generally dependent on distanceUsually on time and distance
Examples Rental of bus / coach / car;
 Hourly rental service by taxi aggregators (e.g., Ola Rental, Uber Hire).
 Transport by bus / auto;
 Bus / coach charter services;
 Transportation of students between home and educational institution;
 Motorised Taxi services;
 Chauffeur-driven car hire services;
 Radio-taxi services;
 Services by taxi aggregators (e.g., Ola Micro, Uber Go);
 Car-pooling services (e.g., Ola Share, Uber Pool).

It should also be noted that both the aforesaid supplies are distinct from finance lease (HSN 9971) and rental service without operator (HSN 9973). However, the possibility of mix-up between HSN 9971 / HSN 9973 vis-à-vis HSN 9966 is less.

What is included under “body corporate”? What is not?

Another term worth deliberating is “Body Corporate”. Explanation (b) of the Notification No.10/2017-Integrated Tax (Rate) draws the definition of “Body Corporate” from Section 2(11) of the Companies Act, 2013. The latter reads:

“Body Corporate … includes a company incorporated outside India, but does not include- (i) a co-operative society registered under any law relating to co-operative societies; and (ii) any other body corporate (not being a company as defined in this Act), which the Central Government may, by notification, specify in this behalf;”

A Limited Liability Partnership (LLP) is also a body corporate, with legal entity separate from its partners and has a perpetual succession. However, Explanation (e) of the Notification No.10/2017-Integrated Tax (Rate) explicitly provides that an LLP should be considered as a partnership firm / firm.

Considering the above, a body corporate (for the purpose of reverse charge) covers a domestic company and a foreign company but does not include a registered co-operative society or an LLP. Therefore, to attract reverse charge on renting of motor vehicle, inter alia:

  • Supplier should be a non-body corporate (for example, individual / Hindu Undivided Family / firm / LLP / registered co-operative society); and
  • Recipient should be a body corporate located in taxable territory (for example, domestic company).

Conditions Triggering Reverse Charge

From a combined reading of the reverse charge and relevant tariff entries, if all the following conditions are satisfied, the recipient is liable to pay GST under reverse charge:

  1. The supply of service is renting of motor vehicle;
  2. The motor vehicle is designed to carry passengers (i.e., the vehicle should be used only for passenger transport, as per the Registration Certificate of the vehicle);
  3. Such renting is with operator;
  4. The cost of fuel is included in the consideration charged from the recipient;
  5. The supplier is not a body corporate;
  6. The recipient is a body corporate located in taxable territory; and
  7. The supplier does not charge GST @ 12% in the invoice issued for outward supply.

Therefore, assuming conditions (1–4 and 7 listed above) are fulfilled:

If supplier is:If recipient is:Status of GST liability:
BC (RD)AnyPayable (forward charge)
BC (URD)AnyNon-taxable
NBC (RD or URD)BC in IndiaPayable (reverse charge)
NBC (RD)Other than 'BC in India'Payable (forward charge)
NBC (URD)Other than 'BC in India'Non-taxable
BC: Body Corporate; NBC: Non-Body Corporate;
RD: Registered under GST law; URD: Unregistered under GST law

Clarificatory or Expansion in Scope?

The relevant reverse charge entry (till December 30, 2019) defined the scope of supplier as one paying GST @ 5%, which indicates the supplier must be registered under the GST law. On the other hand, the amended entry defines the scope of supplier as one who does not charge GST @ 12%, which indicates the supplier could be either registered or unregistered under the GST law. Hence, it is apparent that the scope of the reverse charge entry is enlarged.

Nevertheless, vide paragraph 6 of Circular No.130/2019 dated December 31, 2019, the Government clarified the said amendment as merely clarificatory in nature, effectively making it retrospective. Perusal of paragraphs 4 and 5 of the said Circular lends credence to that approach albeit ambiguously. If this is the intent of law-maker, one more amendment or clarification may be in the offing! Else, years down, a shrewd taxpayer may litigate the expansion in scope!

Srinivasan V, Advocate

Recent Posts

EWB detention proceedings conclude on penalty payment, no need to issue order: Orissa HC

Orissa HC judgment dt. 18.02.2025 in W.P.(C) No. 3055 of 2025 Goods were detained &…

3 weeks ago

Refund limitation for GST wrongly paid

GST was paid but later clarified as not payable by a beneficial circular. In Messrs…

1 month ago

GST | Should 3 months be construed as 90 days for limitation?

Order of the Andhra Pradesh High Court [dated 05.02.2025, in Cotton Corporation of India vs.…

1 month ago

GST | Should the date of issue of notice/order be included to calculate limitation?

Order of the Patna High Court [dated 04.02.2025, in Brand Protection Services (P.) Ltd. vs.…

1 month ago

Notice/order can be served on the portal only if it cannot be served in person / by post / email: Madras HC

Order of the High Court of Madras [dated 06.01.2025, in Udumalpet Sarvodaya Sangham vs. Authority,…

2 months ago

Goods intercepted due to absence of e-invoice; proceedings to lie u/s.122 not s.129 CGST Act: HC

Order of the High Court of Kerala [dated 07.11.2024, in OSEL Devices Ltd. vs. Assistant…

4 months ago