GST Posts

Arrest for offences under GST law prior to conviction

Who has the power to arrest?

Power to arrest, prior to conviction, is specified under Section 69 of the CGST Act, 2017. Such power can be exercised only by the Commissioner, viz., the Commissioner of central tax, the Principal Commissioner of central tax, the Commissioner of integrated tax, the Commissioner of State tax or the Principal Commissioner / Chief Commissioner of State tax, as defined under Section 2(24) ibid.

When can it be exercised?

The Commissioner should have reasons to believe that any of the following offences were committed, where the tax alleged to be evaded or ITC allegedly wrongly availed / utilised or refund allegedly wrongly taken exceeds Rs.4 crore:

  1. Goods / services supplied without issue of invoice, with intent to evade tax;
  2. Invoice / bill issued without supply of goods / services, resulting in wrongful ITC availment / utilisation or tax refund;
  3. ITC availed using fake invoice / without invoice;
  4. Tax collected but not paid to the Government beyond 3 months from the due date.

Similarly, the Commissioner can exercise the powers of arrest if he has reasons to believe that any offence specified u/s.132 ibid has been committed by a person who was earlier convicted of an offence u/s.132 ibid.

Procedure

The Commissioner can authorise any officer of central tax / state tax, as the case may be, to arrest.

If the tax alleged to be evaded or ITC allegedly wrongly availed / utilised or refund allegedly wrongly taken (in any of the four circumstances listed above) exceeds Rs.10 crore, such offences are cognizable and non-bailable. The officer shall inform the grounds of arrest to such person and produce him before a Magistrate within 24 hours.

In all other situations were a person is arrested pursuant to Section 69 ibid, he shall be admitted to bail or in default of bail, forwarded to the custody of the Magistrate. The Deputy Commissioner or the Assistant Commissioner shall, for the purpose of releasing an arrested person on bail or otherwise, have the same powers and be subject to the same provisions as an officer-in-charge of a police station.

Srinivasan V, Advocate

Recent Posts

EWB detention proceedings conclude on penalty payment, no need to issue order: Orissa HC

Orissa HC judgment dt. 18.02.2025 in W.P.(C) No. 3055 of 2025 Goods were detained &…

3 weeks ago

Refund limitation for GST wrongly paid

GST was paid but later clarified as not payable by a beneficial circular. In Messrs…

1 month ago

GST | Should 3 months be construed as 90 days for limitation?

Order of the Andhra Pradesh High Court [dated 05.02.2025, in Cotton Corporation of India vs.…

1 month ago

GST | Should the date of issue of notice/order be included to calculate limitation?

Order of the Patna High Court [dated 04.02.2025, in Brand Protection Services (P.) Ltd. vs.…

1 month ago

Notice/order can be served on the portal only if it cannot be served in person / by post / email: Madras HC

Order of the High Court of Madras [dated 06.01.2025, in Udumalpet Sarvodaya Sangham vs. Authority,…

2 months ago

Goods intercepted due to absence of e-invoice; proceedings to lie u/s.122 not s.129 CGST Act: HC

Order of the High Court of Kerala [dated 07.11.2024, in OSEL Devices Ltd. vs. Assistant…

4 months ago